POPE LEO XIV’S MESSAGE ON THE DIFFICULTY OF ORGANIZING

POPE_LEO_XIV’S_MESSAGE_ON_THE_DIFFICULTY_OF_ORGANIZING

 

A gift and a path

“Indeed,” Pope Leo XIV marveled, “they are entrusted to us, who were chosen by Him before we were formed in our mothers’ wombs, reborn in the waters of Baptism and, surpassing our limitations and with no merit of our own, brought here and sent forth from here, so that the Gospel might be proclaimed to every creature.”

Two different attitudes

“Who do people say that the Son of Man is?” the new Holy Father repeated, noting, “If we reflect on the scene we are considering, we might find two possible answers, which characterize two different attitudes.”

First, Pope Leo said, there was the response of the world, which “will not hesitate to reject and eliminate Him” once “His presence becomes irksome” also because of “His stern moral requirements.”

Then there is the other possible response to Jesus’ question, that of ordinary people, who see Him “as an upright man of courage”; but to them “He is only a man, and therefore, in times of danger, during His passion, they too abandon Him and depart disappointed.”

Missionary outreach needed where difficult to preach witness

What is striking about these two attitudes, the Pope said, is their relevance today, for, they, the Holy Father acknowledged, embody notions that we could easily find on the lips of many men and women in our own time, even if, while essentially identical, they are expressed in different language.

“Even today,” he warned, “there are many settings in which the Christian faith is considered absurd, meant for the weak and unintelligent.  Settings where other securities are preferred, like technology, money, success, power, or pleasure.”

These are contexts, he highlighted, “where it is not easy to preach the Gospel and bear witness to its truth, where believers are mocked, opposed, despised or at best tolerated and pitied.”  

“Yet, precisely for this reason,” he said, “they are the places where our missionary outreach is desperately needed.” [Excerpts from: Pope Leo XIV to Cardinals: ‘We are to bear witness to our joyful faith in Christ’ – Vatican News.]

THE ZEPP-LAROUCHE SPHERE OF CHANGE

THE_ZEPP-LAROUCHE_SPHERE_OF_CHANGE

The present report proposes a project in constructive geometry meant to elevate your mind to the triply-connected level of galactic thinking for the purpose of making axiomatic changes; that is, the different levels of hypothesis, higher hypothesis, and hypothesizing the higher hypothesis. This is the elevating process of the mind that Lyndon LaRouche identified as the domain of Sphaerics, the domain of universal physical principles which is necessary for making changes in the universe as a whole. This construction, therefore, is an expression of Lyndon LaRouche’s Four Laws and of Helga Zepp-LaRouche’s Ten Principles.

The axiomatic question this poses for us now is: how can the domain of geometry help us understand the Zepp-LaRouche principles underlying security and development for the global world economy which is presently in its worst crisis in history? Ironically, the answer to that question is located in the form of dissonant action known as the musical Lydian modality; that is, the form of action which proceeds by dividing the whole by half and by half of the halves again.

 

FRANCIS WILLIAMS: THE IRONY OF A GALACTIC DISCOVERY OF PRINCIPLE IN ART AND SCIENCE

FRANCIS_WILLIAMS_THE_IRONY_OF_A_GALACTIC_DISCOVERY_OF_PRINCIPLE_IN_ART_AND_SCIENCE

Jason Ross sent me an article a few weeks ago written by an Indian British professor of history from Princeton, Fara Dabhoiwala, about an unsigned and unidentified portrait which had turned up for sale on the London art market in the Fall of 1928, “because of its fine rendition of an 18th-century mahogany table and chair. The beauty of this portrait, however, is that it has nothing to do with mahogany.

Not only does this portrait tell the most elementary and fundamental truth about British racial behavior, but it also expresses the most advanced and elevated form of epistemological knowledge about Art and Science that I have ever seen on this side of the Atlantic.

 

HOW TO LIVE IN THE FUTURE AND NEVER GET LOST

HOW_TO_LIVE_IN_THE_FUTURE_AND_NEVER_GET_LOST

Do you know how to think ahead of time? What kind of knowledge do you need to have in order to be able to tell what is going to happen next? This sort of foreknowledge is only available to people who think like Lyndon LaRouche.  That is why the change to a new paradigm, which is presently taking place, is right on time because everybody now has the opportunity to make this new discovery in time.

The way to access this new time frame is to understand what the nature of the old paradigmatic system was about and why it is currently falling apart of its own accord. Everything around you is collapsing and nothing appears to be working because the validity of the present form of liberal-democratic government has come to an end. Trump has taken the route that he is on, because he knows something about the future that most people don’t even want to inquire about.

As outrageous as it may appear to be, the recent comparison that Gerry Rose made of Jeanne d’Arc and Donald Trump is an appropriate one, because in both cases, the beneficiary is Humanity. “Trump is a Jeanne d’Arc-inspired man with a big EGO”; and therefore, he is willing to take chances and even to die for what he knows to be the truth for the benefit of all of mankind. “I don’t want advantage, I want PEACE,” Trump said to Zelensky.

 

HOW TO MAKE A DISCOVERY OF PRINCIPLE (2)

HOW_TO_MAKE_A_DISCOVERY_OF_PRINCIPLE_(2)

Further reflections on my last report of February 12, 2025 led me to make some additional remarks on Lyndon Larouche’s investigations for an “adequate projection of the distribution of prime numbers.” An additional six pages to my first report have been included here for that purpose.

There is an innate ordering principle to numbers which Gottfried Leibniz called “preestablished harmony.”  Leibniz wrote that such harmony was created by God for a purpose that has not yet been made clear to mankind and which remains to be investigated.