Author Archives: Pierre Beaudry

THE_COINCIDENCE_OF_OPPOSITES_AS_A_DISCOVERY_FROM_THE_FUTURE

The most important thing that Lyndon LaRouche taught me was how to change myself into becoming a truthful human being; that is, by changing myself in such a way that I would never again be the former naïve self that I used to be. What LaRouche taught me was how to change my past in such a way that my future would become twisted into the present of what my past should have been. This is not only a new form of geometry; this is also a new state of mind, a new paradigm shift into a higher domain of thinking. But, don’t take my word for it, you can construct it yourself.

LYNDON_LAROUCHE’S_TRANSFINITE_HOLOGRAPHIC_MEMORY

Reflecting a unique moment of correspondence between two scientific minds, Lyndon LaRouche wrote in 1987 a series of very crucial Remarks on Gurwitsch’s Method. By publishing this project, LaRouche was demonstrating how to restore the necessary human historical memory that is required to make the next step of progress beyond the present day governing Epstein corruption.

LaRouche compared his work to a holographic memory which would store records of information like holograms that can store large amounts of data within a small physical space.

THE_WISE_WORDS_OF_RUSSIAN_FOREIGN_MINISTER_SERGEY_LAVROV

During his press conference on February 6, 2016, and immediately following his meeting with the Federal Department of Foreign Affairs of the Swiss Confederation, Ignazio Cassis, and the Secretary General of the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE), Feridun Sinirlioglu, Russian Foreign Minister, Sergey Lavrov, suggested that we ask ourselves the question of what is the root cause of the current world strategic mess we are in. The question that Lavrov wants the western media to ask openly is: Is the West attempting to impose a Nazi regime over the planet?

HOW_BEAUTY_CHANGES_THE_WORLD

This is a little exercise to test the usefulness of AI and to evaluate to what extend it should be trusted with respect to inquiries about human emotions. A few days ago, I put the following statement in my Internet search engine:

“Unless our human emotions can catch up with our advances in science, we are doomed.”

Not surprisingly, AI was incapable of responding properly to that statement, because it could not understand the meaning of it. The statement is concerned with the necessity to improve our understanding of human emotions, but the AI responses were concerned with the impact of technology on human society. In fact, the only thing that will make your emotions catch up with your advances in science is beauty. The five responses AI gave were all centered on the frailty of human beings. The most remarkable aspect of this AI misunderstanding is the emphasis it puts on its failure in relating to human emotions.

HOW_DOES_DIVINE_TIMING_COINCIDE_WITH_HUMAN_READINESS

As far as the human mind can grasp an approximation of God’s Time, the Divine Timing of the eternal must be made congruent with the geometry that Lyndon LaRouche identified as change in the “simultaneity of temporal eternity.”

Since that is the case for human timing, then, how can one make that Divine Timing congruent with a universal process of axiomatic changes and how can human beings be made ready for such events in historical physical space-time?