I am happy to offer my readers a rebuttal to my last report ON THE FALLACY OF GRAVITATIONAL WAVES by Ben Deniston who asked me to post his reply on my blog. You will find Deniston’s reply under the following title:
Category Archives: Posts
ON THE FALLACY OF GRAVITATIONAL WAVES
Are so-called “gravitational waves” a confirmation of Albert Einstein’s General Theory of Relativity or are they simply an attempt to prove the existence of black holes? Did Einstein ever consider the universe to be an immense lake on which the interferometric ripples of colliding black holes could become the proof of the curvature of gravity in physical space-time? Since I was asked by several readers to look into this matter, I will attempt to answer these two questions as briefly as possible from the vantage point of epistemology and give a sense of how to solve this type of problem.
THE CHINESE PRINCIPLE OF SELF-RESTRAINT FOR THE SAKE OF OTHERS
When is an idea valid for all of mankind? Is it when it becomes accepted by the majority of the people? No. Why? Because deductive forms of thinking based on public opinion are always false.
Similarly, the deductive thinker believes that a new scientific experiment is validated when it proves that the current scientific theory is correct. That is also wrong. In fact, a new experiment is validated only when it shows that the current scientific knowledge is false.
Contrary to all popular logic, new ideas become valid when they go against public opinion, by means of a three-step-test of truthfulness: First, when the truth of the new idea starts seeping through the fibers of society under a hidden form until its time comes to change the past; secondly, when its detractors start making up lies about it in order to hide the danger of its truthfulness; and thirdly, when its detractors finally self-destruct under the load of their own lies.
The ancient Chinese idea of self-restraint for the sake of others is about this principle of change, and that’s what is presently emerging around the planet as the new governing paradigm for the future of mankind. Se the latest EIR: The Common Future for Mankind and www.newparadigm.schillerinstitute.com)
THE CHINESE PRINCIPLE OF SELF-RESTRAINT FOR THE SAKE OF OTHERS
THE COSMIC-TRIPLE-JUMP OF THE PLASMA UNIVERSE
Up until the 1950’s, the universe was usually assumed to be composed of ordinary physical matter. During the 1960’s plasma physicist, Hannes Alfven considered that since earlier atom-smashing experiments showed asymmetry in the production of particles and antiparticles, it were possible that the universe be composed of ambiplasma; that is, composed of matter and antimatter.
In this report, I will show how the three leading plasma physicists, Anthony Peratt, Hannes Alfven, and Kristian Birkeland have found good reasons to believe that the universe was also composed of matterofmind; that is to say, that the universe could only be understood fundamentally from the vantage point of a triply-connected scientific mind.
MASKIROVKA, THE BENEFIT OF THE OTHER UNDER THE GUISE OF DECEPTION
The irony of the present world strategic situation lies in the fact that most American leaders are incapable of understanding the way the Russians and the Chinese think about war, because all they expect from them is deception.
This report on the Russian method of Maskirovka, that is, on what became known as “deception warfare,” is intended to reveal the truth behind the surprise 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis, and show how to avoid nuclear World War III in the immediate future.
The report has four sections:
- THE EPISTEMOLOGICAL NATURE OF MASKIROVKA
- HOW RUSSIA USED MASKIROVKA AGAINST NAPOLEON
- THE MASKIROVKA OF THE CUBAN MISSILE CRISIS
- NOTE ON THE 1962 KENNEDY-KHRUSHCHEV CORRESPONDENCE
MASKIROVKA, THE BENEFIT OF THE OTHER UNDER THE GUISE OF DECEPTION
