Author Archives: Pierre Beaudry

THE_ZEPP-LAROUCHE_SPHERE_OF_CHANGE

The present report proposes a project in constructive geometry meant to elevate your mind to the triply-connected level of galactic thinking for the purpose of making axiomatic changes; that is, the different levels of hypothesis, higher hypothesis, and hypothesizing the higher hypothesis. This is the elevating process of the mind that Lyndon LaRouche identified as the domain of Sphaerics, the domain of universal physical principles which is necessary for making changes in the universe as a whole. This construction, therefore, is an expression of Lyndon LaRouche’s Four Laws and of Helga Zepp-LaRouche’s Ten Principles.

The axiomatic question this poses for us now is: how can the domain of geometry help us understand the Zepp-LaRouche principles underlying security and development for the global world economy which is presently in its worst crisis in history? Ironically, the answer to that question is located in the form of dissonant action known as the musical Lydian modality; that is, the form of action which proceeds by dividing the whole by half and by half of the halves again.

FRANCIS_WILLIAMS_THE_IRONY_OF_A_GALACTIC_DISCOVERY_OF_PRINCIPLE_IN_ART_AND_SCIENCE

Jason Ross sent me an article a few weeks ago written by an Indian British professor of history from Princeton, Fara Dabhoiwala, about an unsigned and unidentified portrait which had turned up for sale on the London art market in the Fall of 1928, “because of its fine rendition of an 18th-century mahogany table and chair. The beauty of this portrait, however, is that it has nothing to do with mahogany.

Not only does this portrait tell the most elementary and fundamental truth about British racial behavior, but it also expresses the most advanced and elevated form of epistemological knowledge about Art and Science that I have ever seen on this side of the Atlantic.

HOW_TO_LIVE_IN_THE_FUTURE_AND_NEVER_GET_LOST

Do you know how to think ahead of time? What kind of knowledge do you need to have in order to be able to tell what is going to happen next? This sort of foreknowledge is only available to people who think like Lyndon LaRouche.  That is why the change to a new paradigm, which is presently taking place, is right on time because everybody now has the opportunity to make this new discovery in time.

The way to access this new time frame is to understand what the nature of the old paradigmatic system was about and why it is currently falling apart of its own accord. Everything around you is collapsing and nothing appears to be working because the validity of the present form of liberal-democratic government has come to an end. Trump has taken the route that he is on, because he knows something about the future that most people don’t even want to inquire about.

As outrageous as it may appear to be, the recent comparison that Gerry Rose made of Jeanne d’Arc and Donald Trump is an appropriate one, because in both cases, the beneficiary is Humanity. “Trump is a Jeanne d’Arc-inspired man with a big EGO”; and therefore, he is willing to take chances and even to die for what he knows to be the truth for the benefit of all of mankind. “I don’t want advantage, I want PEACE,” Trump said to Zelensky.

HOW_TO_MAKE_A_DISCOVERY_OF_PRINCIPLE_(2)

Further reflections on my last report of February 12, 2025 led me to make some additional remarks on Lyndon Larouche’s investigations for an “adequate projection of the distribution of prime numbers.” An additional six pages to my first report have been included here for that purpose.

There is an innate ordering principle to numbers which Gottfried Leibniz called “preestablished harmony.”  Leibniz wrote that such harmony was created by God for a purpose that has not yet been made clear to mankind and which remains to be investigated.

HOW_TO_MAKE_A_DISCOVERY_OF_PRINCIPLE (2)

There is an innate ordering principle to numbers which Gottfried Leibniz called “preestablished harmony.”  According to him, such harmony was created by God for a purpose that has not yet been made clear to mankind, and which remains to be investigated as to its purpose. Here, in substance, is what he wrote about it:

“It is good to give an example. Let us take in order the numbers: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 etc. and then their squares: 0 1 4 9 16 25 36 49 64 81 100 etc., and the differences between these squares: 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 etc. We find that the differences between the squares of the numbers taken in order are the odd numbers, again in order; and after having tested a long sequence of numbers, and found that this holds good, we justifiably presume that it will always continue to hold good to infinity; but we do not thereby see either the necessity or the cause of it, which depends on certain demonstrative reasons taken from the source, or a priori. Souls capable of these reasonings are called ‘minds,’ and it can be rightly said of them that they are made in the image of God, and that there is a society between God and them, so that with regard to them, God is not only what an architect is to his building, but also what a Prince is to his subjects.” [ Leibniz and the Two Sophies: The Philosophical Correspondence]

Why would such preestablished harmony exist among numbers? And what makes it necessary to have such a divine a priori ordering? Why were numbers the chosen ones to represent such a preestablished harmony? What is its purpose and what does it tell us about the lawfulness of the universe? What was God’s Intention? You may want to try to understand the following biquadratic geometrical construction and see if my hypothesis for the coincidence of opposites of Nicholas of Cusa and of the I Ching (Book of Changes) is on the right track.