Author Archives: Pierre Beaudry

Today, December 18, 2018, Le Figaro newspaper announced that French President Emmanuel Macron has put a priority on the debate that the Yellow Vests have been demanding the government to accept; that is, the question of  a Citizen Initiative Referendum (RIC). The Yellow Vest movement is demanding that this citizen’s right be enshrined into the French Constitution. The demand is considered a means of containing and of putting an end to popular insurrections in France; however, it intends to accomplish more than that. The irony is that Macron has to accept it, because he cannot be perceived as anti-democratic. He has no choice; the RIC is part of the DNA of human freedom.

THE FRENCH ‘CITIZEN INITIATIVE REFERENDUM’ (RIC)

The end of the failed Oligarchical European system has come: liberalism and geopolitics have entered into a black hole where the more they try to get out by using their old axiomatic rules of conflict, the faster they sink into it.

WHY THE FRENCH, THE BRITISH, AND THE GERMAN GOVERNMENTS ARE SELF-DESTROYING TOGETHER AT THE SAME TIME

How can you solve this political paradox: the left and right political parties of opposite tendencies in France cannot exist together and yet, they are currently expressing a common purpose which is to improve the well-being of the whole population. This report is about discovering how to break your shackles, solve this paradox by discovering the coincidence of opposites, and free yourself from yourself by thinking from outside of the box that you live in.

A delightful example that illustrates this experiment of Plato’s Cave is the axiom busting dialogue which recently took place in France between the President of Solidarité & Progrès, Jacques Cheminade, the astrophysicist and poet, Jean Pierre Luminet, and the director-moderator of the Toursky Theater of Marseille, Richard Martin, on November 28, 2018.

THE PARADOX OF THE PRISONER

I am always delightfully surprised by how prescient Lyn is. After 40 odd years of knowing Lyn and reading his writings, I should be used to his prescience. But each time it hits me like a thunderbolt from above.

Lyn’s 1977 report on HOW TO EVALUATE A BRITISH INTELLIGENCE NETWORK  is emphatically a case in point. I believe it should be made available far and wide, but especially to strategically minded leaders around the world who have a direct or indirect affiliation with the historical humanist faction that LaRouche is referring to.

ADDENDUM TO THE PARADOX OF THE AMERICAN DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC

The man-in-the-street is generally indifferent to what is going on in government because he expects that his elected officials will provide him with a relatively reliable and stable set of social rules of conduct for him to follow in order to prevent him from causing any social trouble, and that he won’t have to worry about his security, as long as he is permitted to do whatever he wants with his own personal life. Such an undeclared creed of political freedom of current western countries is called: “Going along to get along.”

However, sometimes, a catastrophe occurs, and this delusional man-in-the-street is forced to think about his future and the future of mankind, because a general war has broken out and he is called to mobilize all of his forces for the purpose of protecting and defending the country he lives in. He may not be ready and willing to do that, because he has not been properly prepared.

As a result, this poor man’s identity breaks down, because he is incapable of developing for and by himself a sense of creative individuality, which would enable him to discover the reason why he was created in the first place, and so he will be incapable of understanding why he must sacrifice his so-called “well-being” at the altar of his nation. The American system of government was explicitly established to educate its citizenry on how to cope with such eventualities and avoid such catastrophes.

THE PARADOX OF THE AMERICAN DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC