Author Archives: Pierre Beaudry

Earlier this year, I resolved to investigate a little studied domain of epistemology that Nicholas of Cusa had developed in the spirit of Plato and with the help of a few Pythagoreans; that is, the domain of incommensurable proportionalities in the coincidence of opposites. The proportion I am putting under scrutiny here is as follows:

The polyhedron is to the sphere as the polygon is to the circle in the same proportion as the human mind is to God’s Mind.

Of all of the Platonists throughout history, it is Nicholas of Cusa who best understood the epistemological necessity of relating the human mind to such incommensurable opposite realities as God’s Mind, in proportion to the human mind. And, what he conceived within such a proportion, he applied to a new conception of music and of time, a conception that he identified as a modality of “timeless time.”

CUSA’S SCIENCE OF CREATIVELY THINKING THE FUTURE 

“Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr., the American economist and statesman who compiled, between 1957 and 2007, the most accurate record of economic forecasting in the world, passed away on February 12, 2019. The author of thousands of articles and over 100 books and book-length pamphlets and strategic studies, LaRouche was one of the most controversial political figures in all of American history.” by LaRouchePAC Editorial

OFFICIAL OBITUARY: LYNDON H. LAROUCHE, JR. (1922-2019)

Lyndon LaRouche passed away on February 12, 2019. Philosopher, economist, and statesman, LaRouche will be remembered as the immortal Promethean and Platonic thinker who had the courage of going against all odds to establish the principle for the emergence of a New Just World Economic Order. His voice will also be remembered and will continue to resonate in multiple other fields as well.

          The purpose of this report is to celebrate the invaluable contribution he made to the epistemology of the creative process.

IN MEMORY OF LYNDON H. LAROUCHE JR. (1922-2019)

Today, February 12, 2019, is a sad day because Lyndon LaRouche has passed away. However, this should also be a moment to rejoice, because Lyn always wished for his fellowman to focus on the future by making sure that the past that failed to be would merge through the present as what should have been.

Lyn, you will always be with us.

One of the most difficult aspects of examining an axiomatic change is finding the appropriate visual pedagogical material for it. For example, it is very difficult to capture change as the principle of time because once you have captured it, it is no longer changing. As a result, representing time as change always carries with it the inversion of the Heraclitus irony that everything changes except change itself.

The means that scientists have used for showing the “visible” characteristics of change have generally been fallacies of composition, especially in their more recent attempts at illustrating Einstein’s curvature of space-time with his hypothesis of gravitational waves. I am introducing here a new hypothesis which may shock some of you but which can justify its validity by construction only: “Change is the curvature of time because time is the curvature of change.”

In a report written in 1986 titled: TRUTH IS BEAUTY AND BEAUTY IS TRUTH: UNDERSTANDING THE SCIENCE OF MUSIC,and now recently published by EIR, Lyndon LaRouche identified that it is the anti-entropic principle of the creative process of the human mind, connecting both the domains of physics and of artistic composition, which is necessary to internalize in order to overcome past axiomatic failures and avoid future human catastrophes.

THOUGHTS ON HOW TO CONSTRUCT AN AXIOMATIC CHANGE