Author Archives: Pierre Beaudry

CREATIVE_THINKING_IS_TRANSFORMATIVE_THINKING

Pope Leo XIV has made an extraordinary discovery of principle, just prior to the Christmas period of December, 2025, when he decided to act, publicly, on a daring action that very few people have been able to make during the entire history of mankind. The Pope discovered that Eastern Orthodox Christians may be the only ones who could succeed in bringing the East and the West back together again into a unified One Humanity, after 971 years of separation.

THE_HIDDEN_SECRET_MEASURE_UNDERLYING_THE_CONSTRUCTION_OF_THE_PARTHENON

“Why is the One always hiding behind the Many?” This question came to me after a reader had asked me what sort of relationship existed between the Parthenon and the Fibonacci sequence of the golden section. So, when I consulted my old friend Dehors Debonneheure (Early Riser), he answered back to me that the reason why the One is always hiding behind is because it is very difficult to figure out why “the whole is to the larger part as this larger part is to the smaller one.” Such is the process behind the golden proportion of growth, which has been hiding for centuries behind the construction of the Parthenon and which is finally coming out in the open.

FRANCOIS_RABELAIS_AND_LEONARDO_DA_VINCI,_A_UTOPIAN_MOMENT_OF_DIALOGUE_IN_TEMPORAL_ETERNITY

If ever François Rabelais and Leonardo Da Vinci had the opportunity to meet in person, it would have been under the leadership of King Francis I during the last three years of Leonardo’s life, from 1516 to 1519 when Leonardo was living at the Loire Valley Château du Clos Lucé, courtesy of the King of France.

The following Utopian dialogue, which I have translated several parts of below, was composed in 2019 for the 500^th anniversary of Leonardo’s death by 22 students from the Lycée François RABELAIS of Chinon, France.

WHAT_IS_BEHIND_THE_COMPLEX_DOMAIN_OF_PLATO’S_QUADRIVIUM

Can you discover the principle of composition of something by looking behind it? For example: What is behind the complex domain of Plato’s quadrivium? The problem I am attempting to solve is not an easy one, because it comes from a long period of misunderstanding of the complex domain between the Gauss-Riemann-LaRouche approach on one side, and the academic fallacy concocted by Euler and Lagrange on the opposite side.

ARE_YOU_ABLE_TO_FORETELL_THE_FUTURE

Are there ways that the human mind can know in advance of time what the future will be? Aside from someone who has the gift of prophecy, there seems to be no positive answer to this question.

However, this raises another question, which is: are we condemned to know only the past and the present and never the future? Is there a way to change our understanding of time in such a way that the future can be made present all of the time?