Category Archives: Posts

Most people think that everything that exists should be conceived as discrete entities and be measured within a universe of linear continuity. That is an absurd and unscientific way of looking at the world.

As Lyn demonstrated in his 1987 report on THE ‘STRONG HYPOTHESIS’ OF BIOPHYSICS, the human mind has not been created for the purpose of pushing and pulling things around randomly like on a billiard table; it has been created to function on a preestablished principle of least action. As he put it in that old report:

“The human mind was designed to be a universal tool, so simply constructed that even a new-born infant might employ it efficiently. The mind was therefore most ingeniously contrived to operate according to but one single principle. This tool, thus devised, can solve any problem confronting us in the universe as a whole. Wisdom is thus the state of ignorance achieved by knowing nothing not produced by means solely of this single elementary principle of mental simplicity and laziness termed an intelligible principle of least action.”

Happy reading.

THE LEAST ACTION PRINCIPLE OR, HOW TO INCREASE YOUR ENERGY-FLUX-DENSITY

Here is another little gem from Lyn. This 1987 memorandum on Dr. Sydney Webb’s work in biophysics is an axiom buster of the first order. It is the best report I have ever read on Lyn’s original discovery of the least action principle and on the fallacy of composition of the deductive method. Enjoy.

LYNDON LAROUCHE, THE ‘STRONG HYPOTHESIS’ OF BIOPHYSICS, 1987

THE SECRET OF HUMAN CREATIVITY

All four Gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke and John have reported on the prediction that Jesus made during the Last Supper, stating that Peter would disown him three times before the night was over, and all four mentioned the event of that denial in one form or another. If ever there was a religious subject that was made popular for painters in the Netherlands during the first half of the seventeenth century, it was the denial of Peter. More than twenty European artists of that period, most of them were Dutch, chose to depict the famous biblical scene, but none of them touched on the subject in the profound axiomatic manner that Rembrandt did.

Rembrandt chose to go against the public opinion view of Peter’s denial and addressed the fundamental issue of the axiomatic change that takes place in the mind of an individual at the moment when he is confronted with the truth of having to risk his own life for the benefit of another. This report has three sections:

1. THE STORY OF THE NIGHT WHEN PETER’S LIFE WAS CHANGED
2. THE TURBULENT SENSUAL NOISE BEHIND THE DIFFERENT POPULAR PAINTINGS OF PETER’S DENIAL
3. THE REMBRANT AXIOMATIC SETTING FOR THE DENIAL OF PETER

REMBRANDT, THE DENIAL OF PETER

Twenty-nine years ago on his birthday, September 8, 1987, Lyndon LaRouche wrote an internal memorandum called: THE ‘STRONG HYPOTHESIS’ OF BIOPHYSICS, in response to some questions that Dr. Sidney J. Webb, M.D., had posed with respect to his research on “Nonlinear Phenomena in Bioenergetics and Oncology.”

A month later, on October 16, 1987, Dr. Wolfgang Lillge, M. D. wrote an article on the same subject in EIR, in which he stated: “We are still very much in the dark about what actually causes a normal cell to become a cancer cell, with all the implications that has.” The point Dr. Lillge made was that the greatest obstacle to discovering a cure for cancer had not been the lack of funding or the lack of investigators in the field of cancer research, but was located in the deductive nature of the epistemological method of scientific investigation itself.

The time has now come to reopen this investigation with a new look into how Kepler had solved this deductive problem with constructive geometry by using the LaRouche method of multiply-connected spiral action by time reversal.

KEPLER’S SOLUTION TO THE CREATIVE PROCESS

In the book of The Great Learning, the Confucian sage, Zhu Xi, brings together three discoveries of principles which form the essential actions of the creative process of the human mind. These three principles are the Principle of 氣 Qi (Power), the Principle of 理 Li (Reason), and the Principle of 太極 Taiji (Ultimate End). The congruence of these three principles works like the principle of the Peace of Westphalia.

When these three principles are brought together congruently, among three different minds of completely different cultures, they confirm the nature of Lyndon LaRouche’s anti-entropic principle of increase-in-energy-flux-density; otherwise the relationship is entropic.

This report shows how such a discovery is expressed in Chinese artistic composition through a unique curvature of laughter which takes the characteristic of an isochronic surface of negative curvature; that is to say, a surface whose curvature admits of different rates of change to come together in the simultaneity of eternity.

THE CHINESE UNITY OF QI, LI, AND TAIJI IN THE SIMULTANEITY OF ETERNITY